‘Lovelace’: An Insight Into the Reality of an Abusive Relationship

So to start this off: I know Lovelace is not the only film out there to depict an abusive relationship on the big screen. I know that it’s not the most fantastically accurate representation of an abusive relationship out there. I know that it fails to address a lot of the abuse and controversy surrounding the story that the real Linda Lovelace – Linda Boreman – experienced in her own life.

Why bother writing this, then?

lovelace amanda seyfried film abuse

Despite its shortcomings surrounding the context of Lovelace, as a film in its own right and in regards to showing an audience what it’s like to live in an abusive relationship, it does actually weave in some very sophisticated points amongst the explicit examples of abuse we see on screen. Because of this, it’s a great talking point in trying to spot more implicit issues people encounter within relationships in order to prevent them from growing into something far worse – hence why this article is being written.

So, here’s a few things that are on my mind after recently re-watching Lovelace.

Linda’s Abuser Apologises For His Actions

kinopoisk.ru

Elaborating on this, we clearly see that Chuck Traynor (Peter Sarsgaard) doesn’t constantly apologise for his treatment of Linda (Amanda Seyfried) throughout the film, but the scene particularly in mind here is when Chuck rapes Linda on their wedding night. Sitting curled up in a chair, we see Linda avoid eye contact with her husband as she tells him, “you hurt me.”

And Chuck’s soft, loving, kind response is, “I never meant to hurt you, baby”.

There’s a sense that Linda struggles to believe this – but she does it anyway. For her case in particular, she doesn’t really have much of a choice; her parents have essentially told her that now that she’s married, she has a duty to stay with her husband. But there’s likely an element of denial that her husband would ever do anything to intentionally hurt her, perhaps a sense of disbelief that what actually happened was rape.

amanda seyfried peter sarsgaard lovelace abuse

In Lovelace, this scene is clearly depicted as non-consensual sex in order for the audience to have a more black-and-white understanding of what happens, but in real life it can be a lot harder to define. Because of contributing factors like the survivor personally knowing their abuser or major issues such as coercive consent, someone who is sexually abused will likely deny that what happened to them was actually abuse. Alongside this, if the person seems genuinely apologetic for their actions and shows concern for your well-being after the event, a thought that passes through your mind is: “they do care about me. If they care about me, then there’s nothing to worry about. Right?”

There’s Different Reactions to the Revelation of Linda’s Abuse

lovelace sharon stone abusive relationship

Linda’s mother, Dorothy (Sharon Stone), tells her daughter that she must go home to her husband and take the beatings and be grateful for everything he provides for her. Linda’s best friend Patsy (Juno Temple) is extremely concerned about Chuck’s treatment of her. The on-screen depiction of the publication of Linda’s book Ordeal (which describes the abuse she receives from her husband) shows the audience struggling to believe her account of the abuse she experienced, questioning why she didn’t just leave Chuck if her life was so bad.

Unfortunately, this doesn’t differ from real life reactions to revelations of abuse. When a survivor comes forward with their story, consistently people question the honesty of their claims or victim blame and claim that it’s their fault for not recognising the signs of abuse earlier and leaving the relationship.

linda lovelace hugh hefner amanda seyfried james franco abusive relationship.jpg

What Lovelace does well is at first present the mostly positive aspects of Linda and Chuck’s relationship and career at the beginning of the film, and for the second part show the reality of what life was like was Linda. The initial depiction of Linda’s life in the porn industry is how the public perceives it; because we see the glamour and excitement of it all, apart from subtle hints in the film’s storytelling we don’t suspect a tirade of physical, sexual and emotional abuse to be going on behind the scenes. When we do see how things really were in the latter half, there’s a sense of anger we feel for Linda when people doubt the validity of her claims – because we know what she’s experienced. We’ve seen it played out before us.

kinopoisk.ru

Lovelace essentially gives us an insight into the varying perspectives people take on an abusive relationship. Linda is (to begin with) in denial about the abuse, but after finally finding a way of leaving Chuck, and years after she’s able to do this, she feels comfortable coming forward to the public about it – she shows the process abuse survivors have to go through in accepting the reality of what’s happened to them.

A part of the reason for Linda’s hesitance to tell her story is implied to be the backlash she receives for doing this. Her own mother refuses to support her in leaving Chuck, so how the hell are the general public (i.e. a mass audience of complete strangers), going to react to this? The answer: mostly, not well. At all.

So what can we learn from Lovelace? Abusive relationships are extremely complex. The best thing we can do is listen to survivors and offer them the support they need, not tear them to shreds with questions and doubts.

Advertisements

3 comments

  1. Jay Alba · March 8

    Thanks for the article, I really loved the nuance of your perspective. I haven’t seen the film, but what you said about friends/family not believing ppl in an abusive relationships reminded me about A Series of Unfortunate Events. I heard someone say that it’s a bit of an allegory for kids who aren’t taken seriously by other adults when they try to report family abuse.

    Also, on another subject, I find that rape is hard subject to discuss in relation to TV. I’ve had to explain (uncomfortably) to my peers why a scene is in fact a rape, even though it’s not as “traditionally violent” as another person might except. Just b/c two people are married, or if one party stops resisting half-way through, that doesn’t change the fact that it wasn’t consensual. Sorry if that’s a tangent. I clearly have a lot of feelings.

    But anyway, I really enjoyed your article. You have a really strong voice.

    Like

    • reyviews · March 10

      Wow, this comment really made me smile, thank you so much!
      And I remember reading A Series of Unfortunate Events when I was younger and feeling so frustrated about the children never being taken seriously by the adults around them, and it wasn’t until recently that it all started to make a lot more sense to me.
      Like you say, abuse and rape are really hard subjects to address on TV. There just isn’t enough in mainstream education resources that teach people about what consent is or what makes a relationship toxic, so after watching what was in fact a rape scene on TV people may just interpret it as just a bad sexual experience or something along those lines.
      I was just recently having some personal experiences with this kind of stuff (not this kind of thing exactly, but along this sort of line), so it was just on my mind to write about this. Again, thank you for the really nice comment – it actually means a lot to me.

      Like

      • Jay Alba · March 10

        Of course! It’s nice to bond with like-minded ppl=)

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s